RomânăThe editorial board of each issue of the journal is responsible for organizing the article review process.
Each edited article is recorded, sent to the person in charge of verification through the anti-plagiarism system, after which it is sent to two research experts for review.
The editorial secretary shall send the authors the objections and suggestions of the reviewers, in order to improve the scientific quality of the article.
To be published, each article needs two favorable reviews. If the article received a negative review, it is returned to the author for redo.
The editorial board of the journal has the right to withdraw any article from the site, from international databases and / or from the scientific platforms in which the journal is indexed, if it has been found that the author / authors have violated the ethical principles of scientific research.
The articles will be evaluated by the reviewers within the time set by the editorial board, according to the approved form.
The reviewers will evaluate: the relevance of the title; summary content; the topicality of the scientific issue; observance of logical coherence in presentations, descriptions, analyzes; the novelty and originality of the results obtained; the theoretical or applied value of the investigation; observance of scientific style and technical language; the relevance of the conclusions; relevance of bibliographic sources; compliance with technical requirements;
The result of the evaluation will be sent to the publisher and will indicate the degree of acceptance: Excellent, Good, Acceptable, Returned for recovery, Rejected.